The Daily News Online

Logout|My Dashboard
  • May 3, 2015

Online poll


Upstate Niagara joins list of cooperatives ending hormones

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 9:00 am

The Upstate Niagara Cooperative, effective April 1, no longer sells milk from cows treated with hormones.

The cooperative with about 400 members is among the last in the country to ban rBST, a synthetically produced protein hormone that boosts milk output.

“It became a necessity based on our customers,” Dan Wolf, Upstate Niagara chairman, said about the decision. “It was driven by the marketplace.”

The federal government started allowing the hormone in 1993. It hasn’t been found to be harmful to humans or cows. But grocery stores and bottlers have pressured cooperatives to stop using rBST, said Chris Galen, senior vice president of communications for the National Milk Producers Federation.

“It’s the retailers and bottlers that are pushing this,” Galen said by phone Monday. “It’s not so much from the consumers.”

Cooperatives about five years ago started to ban milk from cows with hormones. Many of those cooperatives then marketed “rBST-free milk,” but Galen said that has lost its niche because so little milk now comes from cows with the hormone.

“Upstate Niagara was one of the last to make the decision,” Galen said. “Today it would be pretty hard to find any in the marketplace.”

The Upstate Niagara board voted in October to stop using rBST. The cooperative gave farmers time to transition their herds. Not all the dairies in the cooperative were using rBST, Wolf said.

He wasn’t sure if farmers would now see a significant drop in milk production. Galen said since cooperatives started banning rBST about five years ago, milk production per cow has held steady.

Milk production per cow nationally actually increased from February 2010 to a year later, going from an average of 1,642 pounds per month to 1,666 in February 2011, the U.S. Department of Agriculture reported. In New York, the average cow production increased from 1,560 pounds to 1,620 pounds during that time period.

Farmers have credited higher milk production to better genetics, better feed and the “cow comfort” movement, where dairies try to give cows soft bedding and well ventilated barns.

  • Discuss

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
  • 2 Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness acounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • jackieschmidts posted at 10:49 am on Thu, Apr 21, 2011.

    jackieschmidts Posts: 2

    A retailer or processor wouldn't care less about rBST unless there was some consumer interest in the topic. And there is the problem, consumers don't understand rBST is not an issue; they are ignorant of the facts that use of it on cows is safe and don’t affect humans. But a few environmental type radicals will call retailers demanding it not be used on the farm and then the industry thinks there is this big outcry, when there isn’t. Most people care about price, quality, availability, fat content, calcium and other nutrients when buying milk. rBST is not a reason people will or will not shop for a certain brand of milk.

    After hearing from a few greenie radicals, retailers and processors then take a knee jerk reaction and demand it not be used on the farm. In the end, this position does nothing to help increase milk sales.

    By promoting the fact they are no longer allowing their farmers who are members of their cooperative to use rBST, Upstate Niagara are doing the entire industry a disservice. Creating fear where there is no danger. I’d like to ask this question, how will Upstate guarantee it isn’t being used? What checks do they have in place? How can they test to see if it is being used since there is no test that can detect artificial rBST from that which naturally occurs in cows? This is all a lot to do about nothing.


Local Weather